Dawnfoster (Talk | contribs) (removed poll & added that the decision is made based on technical merits.) |
(added Gerrit as a suggestion) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|[http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/ Rietveld] | |[http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/ Rietveld] | ||
|Apache | |Apache | ||
| + | |Free | ||
| + | | ? | ||
| + | | ? | ||
| + | | ? | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |[http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ Gerrit] | ||
| + | |Apache 2.0 | ||
|Free | |Free | ||
| ? | | ? | ||
There have been requests to consolidate on a code review tool. Please add your suggestions, and we'll have some additional debate on the mailing list and the best tool will be selected based on technical merits.
Please note, all information - particularly cost and infrastructure - needs to be listed for an option to be considered.
| Option | Code license | Cost | Advantages | Disadvantages | Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Do nothing | N/A | Free | It's how we do it now. | Current model may not scale well as project gets larger, and it's easier to add code review tooling earlier than later. | None |
| Reviewboard | MIT | Free | ? | ? | ? |
| Splinter | MPL 1.1 or GPL 2+ | Free | ? | ? | ? |
| Crucible | Source available | Free | ? | ? | ? |
| Rietveld | Apache | Free | ? | ? | ? |
| Gerrit | Apache 2.0 | Free | ? | ? | ? |