(→How can we make the community office meetings more productive / useful?) |
(→Community Office task lists - what works / what doesn't?) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* The idea behind creating proposed / committed task lists was to avoid duplication (multiple people working separately on the same projects) and get more people working on tasks that we needed to complete, but it seems to have just created a barrier to participation. I was hoping that the task lists would give people tangible things to work on, but other people aren't really volunteering to take on new tasks. Should we scrap this whole idea and do something completely different? Should we take what we have and make some changes? --[[User:Dawnfoster|Dawnfoster]] 16:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC) | * The idea behind creating proposed / committed task lists was to avoid duplication (multiple people working separately on the same projects) and get more people working on tasks that we needed to complete, but it seems to have just created a barrier to participation. I was hoping that the task lists would give people tangible things to work on, but other people aren't really volunteering to take on new tasks. Should we scrap this whole idea and do something completely different? Should we take what we have and make some changes? --[[User:Dawnfoster|Dawnfoster]] 16:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Visibility is key. Tasks need to be in a database and published to a dashboard for all to see, easily. Best solution IMO? The common calendar: http://wiki.meego.com/Common_Calendar. This would help solve a great many issues and provide a single portal for time-bound activities. But who will champion? --[[User:Texrat|Texrat]] 18:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC) | * Visibility is key. Tasks need to be in a database and published to a dashboard for all to see, easily. Best solution IMO? The common calendar: http://wiki.meego.com/Common_Calendar. This would help solve a great many issues and provide a single portal for time-bound activities. But who will champion? --[[User:Texrat|Texrat]] 18:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | * I agree we have a problem with lack of contributors willing to coordinate a task and pursue it until completion, but I don't think the (actually quite light) process is the obstacle. I'm not sure what the obstacle is, though. One reason might be that MeeGo currently is attractive to platform developers, less so for all the rest due to lack of products out there. While those developers are busy to take new tasks, non-developers still see the project as too abstract to get really involved. Maybe we at the Community Office could do a better job searching contributors, encouraging, empowering and praising them. Also sharing a clear vision of what is important, what is urgent and why.--[[User:Qgil|Qgil]] 21:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Add your idea / comments here (with signature / timestamp) | * Add your idea / comments here (with signature / timestamp) | ||
Reminder: Community Office Goals for 2011