| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
# Then distro engineer needs to integrate the fix into distribution and change the status to '''RELEASED - FIXED'''. It's a good practice to specifiy in which release the fix is found, a link to the downloadable image is even better to allow proper bug verification. | # Then distro engineer needs to integrate the fix into distribution and change the status to '''RELEASED - FIXED'''. It's a good practice to specifiy in which release the fix is found, a link to the downloadable image is even better to allow proper bug verification. | ||
# '''QA Contact''' or '''Bug Submitter''' verifies bug fixing with the "how to re-produce" instructions in the original bug report when the bug is marked as '''RELEASED - FIXED'''. | # '''QA Contact''' or '''Bug Submitter''' verifies bug fixing with the "how to re-produce" instructions in the original bug report when the bug is marked as '''RELEASED - FIXED'''. | ||
| - | #* Bug reporter is responsible for change bug status to '''VERIFIED'''; If bug reporter doesn't come back to verify bugs in 2 weeks after bugs have been marked RELEASED - FIXED, QA contact will help to retest and verify the bugs with comments "verified on behalf of reporter" added. If QA contact has difficulty to follow up the original bug report, and fails to get clarification from reporter, QA contact will set assign keyword "verification pending" to the bugs | + | #* Bug reporter is responsible for change bug status to '''VERIFIED'''; If bug reporter doesn't come back to verify bugs in 2 weeks after bugs have been marked RELEASED - FIXED, QA contact will help to retest and verify the bugs with comments "verified on behalf of reporter" added. If QA contact has difficulty to follow up the original bug report, and fails to get clarification from reporter, QA contact will set assign keyword "verification pending" to the bugs. |
#* Bug is fixed: Bug status should be changed to '''VERIFIED''' and a comment should be added telling people which image (e.g. netbook-200901221904) the bug has been fixed in. Don't need to mark it as '''CLOSED''' (this is performed later by the QA team). | #* Bug is fixed: Bug status should be changed to '''VERIFIED''' and a comment should be added telling people which image (e.g. netbook-200901221904) the bug has been fixed in. Don't need to mark it as '''CLOSED''' (this is performed later by the QA team). | ||
#* Bug is not fixed: bug status should be changed to '''REOPENED''' and add a comment telling which image you are using and the bug is still there. | #* Bug is not fixed: bug status should be changed to '''REOPENED''' and add a comment telling which image you are using and the bug is still there. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* '''NEEDINFO''' status should only be used for requests against the original bug reporter. | * '''NEEDINFO''' status should only be used for requests against the original bug reporter. | ||
* For "Target Milestone", when reports are in '''OPEN''' or '''RESOLVED''' status, it indicates a proposal to get the fixed for a particular release; When verifying bugs, the target milestone indicates in which particular release the bug is fixed. | * For "Target Milestone", when reports are in '''OPEN''' or '''RESOLVED''' status, it indicates a proposal to get the fixed for a particular release; When verifying bugs, the target milestone indicates in which particular release the bug is fixed. | ||
| + | * If there is a bug which was logged in the earlier releases, and in the latest release it is not reproducible, reporter or QA should leave a comment to indicate that the issue is not reproducible, specify the image information, device information and package information, and ask bug owner if he/she agrees the bug has been fixed. In good situation, bug owner will comment that bug so that we could handle the bug based on comments. If bug owner doesn’t respond, the bug would be retested a week later and if it’s still not reproducible, the bug could be “VERIFIED-FIXED”. | ||
== MeeGo update bug fix acceptance criteria == | == MeeGo update bug fix acceptance criteria == | ||
Contents |
For reporting a bug, see here.
Generally, the approved update release bugs must be fixed and verified in MeeGo Trunk firstly.
1. With Bugzilla, an approved release update (eg 1.1) bug must have a MeeGo bug entry in the latest release (eg 1.2) so QA can verify the latest (eg 1.2) Trunk build has the same bug fix on a target vertical platform.
2. With Bugzilla, an approved release update (eg 1.1) bug should have a bug in the latest release (eg 1.2) as a dependency (or blocker bug) to ensure that the associated bug in the latest release is verified first.
3. Update release engineer should _not_ accept development patch submission for update release unless QA verified in Trunk build and mark the Bugzilla entry accordingly.
Of course, there are some exceptions that don't apply this guideline especially for those bugs in old releases are not applicable to latest release. For example:
1. Bug fixes in old releases' components where the latest release is using a different version;
2. Components used in old releases that are no longer used in trunk;
3. Security fixes that don't apply to the version in trunk, etc.
We like to have fun but we also like the communications to run smoothly. To that end here are some guidelines for participating in Bugzilla.
We have both techies and non-techies here and we both know we don't exactly speak the same language at all times. In case of missing information kindly tell reporters how to provide it, and/or point to https://bugs.meego.com/page.cgi?id=bug-writing.html in case of very vague reports (like "Can't send mail, plz help!!").
Ultimately, the admins reserve the right to block your account. See our process for dealing with violations for more details.
As a non-coder you can get involved by reporting bugs and triaging bug reports.