(missing community context) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:Dm8tbr|Dm8tbr]] 10:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:Dm8tbr|Dm8tbr]] 10:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dm8tbr, thanks for the input! Moved your comment over to the [http://wiki.meego.com/index.php?title=Talk:Quality/Compliance_primer_1.0 talk page on version 1.0] where it will be addressed. Let's consolidate conversations over there. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Bdub|Bdub]] 13:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Community hardware adaptations are not mentioned here at all. It is all "products, products, products". Although I do not argue with the fact that products and their compliance should be a primary concern for MeeGo, community hardware adaptations and the community in general should not be ignored. It just leads to problems, frustration, misunderstandings or in the worst case lawsuits and I hope we all can agree that this is not a desireable outcome.
There has to be a common roof under which community work can happen and that does address the specific needs of community work.
--Dm8tbr 10:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Dm8tbr, thanks for the input! Moved your comment over to the talk page on version 1.0 where it will be addressed. Let's consolidate conversations over there.
--Bdub 13:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)