| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:maxayu|maxayu]] 4 August 2010 | [[User:maxayu|maxayu]] 4 August 2010 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for the rapid reply. I'm not sure to understand why using the "netbook UX" helps to develop applications for MeeGo Netbook : I thought that the prefered way to make apps for MeeGo is to write it in pure Qt, regardless of the targeted UX. So the choosen desktop shell should have little impact on the way to write applications, no ? | ||
| + | [[User:Bzhbok|Bzhbok]] 19:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
I like the idea to make a desktop release of MeeGo. To base this desktop experience on the "netbook UX" is probably the fastest way to get started, but I think it would be even better in the longer term if the "desktop UX" could be derived from KDE :
Bzhbok 21:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Bzhbok,
Thanks for your comments! Using "netbook UX" helps to develop applications for MeeGo Netbook. So it should be kept. KDE or GNOME can be two add-on options.
maxayu 4 August 2010
Thanks for the rapid reply. I'm not sure to understand why using the "netbook UX" helps to develop applications for MeeGo Netbook : I thought that the prefered way to make apps for MeeGo is to write it in pure Qt, regardless of the targeted UX. So the choosen desktop shell should have little impact on the way to write applications, no ?
Bzhbok 19:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)